Filed: Apr. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 15, 2016
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . On February 2, 2016, I conducted a status and scheduling conference which resulted in the entry of an order directing the parties, either jointly or individually, to file by March 10, 2016, any proposed schedule for the filing of non-CJA pretrial motions and corresponding responses. On March 8, 2016, the government and defendants, 1, 2, 4, 9, 13-19, 22, 24, 26, and 28, filed a proposed schedule [#773]. ii I have reviewed the proposed
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN , District Judge . On February 2, 2016, I conducted a status and scheduling conference which resulted in the entry of an order directing the parties, either jointly or individually, to file by March 10, 2016, any proposed schedule for the filing of non-CJA pretrial motions and corresponding responses. On March 8, 2016, the government and defendants, 1, 2, 4, 9, 13-19, 22, 24, 26, and 28, filed a proposed schedule [#773]. ii I have reviewed the proposed s..
More
SCHEDULING ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
On February 2, 2016, I conducted a status and scheduling conference which resulted in the entry of an order directing the parties, either jointly or individually, to file by March 10, 2016, any proposed schedule for the filing of non-CJA pretrial motions and corresponding responses. On March 8, 2016, the government and defendants, 1, 2, 4, 9, 13-19, 22, 24, 26, and 28, filed a proposed schedule [#773].ii I have reviewed the proposed schedule carefully. I now enter the following scheduling order.
ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED as follows:
1. That the following motions and responses shall be filed as identified and scheduled in the table below:
Type of Motion Motion Filing Deadline Response Filing Deadline
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(2) April 25, 2016 30 days after filing deadline
and 12(b)(3)(E)
(excluding other motions
brought under
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3))
Wiretap suppression May 31, 2016 45 days after filing deadline
motions — four corners
and Franks discovery
motions
Wiretap suppression 30 days after rulings on 45 days after filing deadline
motions — non-four Franks discovery motions
corners
18 U.S.C. § 3501 May 31, 2016 21 days after filing deadline
(motions impugning the
admissibility of confessions)
Motions to Suppress 21 days after filing deadline
(other than motions relating May 31, 2016
to wiretaps and motions
under 18 U.S.C. § 3501)
Fed.R.Crim.P. 14 April 25, 2016 30 days after filing deadline
(Motions to sever)
Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3) April 25, 2016 30 days after filing deadline
(includes motions brought
under Fed.R.Crim.P.
12(b)(3)(A) and (B), except
for motions to suppress
relating to wiretaps, motions
under 18 U.S.C. & 3501,
and motions to sever which
are scheduled above
Fed.R.Evid. 609(a)(1) 45 days before trial 15 days after filing deadline
This category does not
describe a type of motion,
but instead, describes a
type of information but, for
the sake of convenience, is
included as a "Type of
Motion."
Fed.R.Evid. 702, 703, 705 60 days before trial 21 days after filing deadline
Summaries under
Fed.R.Crim.P 16(b)(1)(C)
This category does not
describe a type of motion,
but instead, describes a
type of information but, for
the sake of convenience, is
included as a "Type of
Motion."
Fed.R.Evid. 801(d)(2)(E) 60 days before trial 30 days after filing deadline
proffer and disclosures
This category does not
describe a type of motion,
but instead, describes a
type of information but, for
the sake of convenience, is
included as a "Type of
Motion."
Fed.R.Evid. 404(b) 35 days before trial 15 days after filing deadline
disclosur (amends deadline set forth
This category does not in Discovery Conference
describe a type of motion, Memoranda and Order)
but instead, describes a
type of information.
2. That by separate order, the court shall set a telephonic (non-appearance) scheduling conference to set a further status-scheduling conference; counsel for the government shall arrange, initiate, and coordinate the conference call necessary to facilitate the setting conference; and
3. That at the further status-scheduling conference, the court shall determine which timely filed pretrial motions should be set for hearing, i.e., at which the court may receive argument only or both evidence and argument, and shall enter a further scheduling order.
FootNotes
i. The caption does not include the name of any defendant who has filed a Notice of Disposition.
ii. [#773] is an example of the convention I use to identify a specific paper filed in CM/ECF.
