Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

MILLER v. COLVIN, 15-cv-01254-WYD. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20160505954 Visitors: 7
Filed: May 04, 2016
Latest Update: May 04, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRAINTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT WILEY Y. DANIEL , Senior District Judge . The parties' Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [ECF Doc. No. 21], filed May 3, 2016, is GRANTED. Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $5,995.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. How
More

ORDER GRAINTING THE PARTIES' STIPULATED MOTION FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT

The parties' Stipulated Motion for Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act [ECF Doc. No. 21], filed May 3, 2016, is GRANTED.

Defendant shall pay Plaintiff $5,995.00 in attorney fees. Payment of this amount shall constitute a complete release from and bar to any and all claims Plaintiff may have relating to EAJA fees in connection with this action. However, the EAJA award is without prejudice to Plaintiff's attorney's right to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b), 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(c)(1) (2006).

Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Thus, fees should be paid to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff's attorney.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer