HERNANDEZ v. KING, ED CV 13-1914-MWF (SH). (2014)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20140528d85
Visitors: 24
Filed: May 22, 2014
Latest Update: May 22, 2014
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magist
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistr..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
MICHAEL W. FITZGERALD, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the other records on file herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. Further, the Court has engaged in a de novo review of those portions of the Report and Recommendation to which objections have been made. The Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Judgment be entered dismissing the Petition without prejudice to refiling after exhaustion of state remedies.
Source: Leagle
