Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. VALLEJO, 2:12-CR-0156 LKK. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140109837 Visitors: 13
Filed: Jan. 08, 2014
Latest Update: Jan. 08, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION and ORDER LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, PAUL HEMESATH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN, attorney for MARIANO MONTENEGRO VALLEJO, that the status conference of January 7, 2014 be vacated and the matter be set for status conference on March 18, 2014. The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to work to arrang
More

STIPULATION and ORDER

LAWRENCE K. KARLTON, District Judge.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, PAUL HEMESATH, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, and COURTNEY FEIN, attorney for MARIANO MONTENEGRO VALLEJO, that the status conference of January 7, 2014 be vacated and the matter be set for status conference on March 18, 2014.

The reason for this continuance is to allow defense counsel additional time to work to arrange for the DEA laboratory to allow the defense expert to conduct qualitative analysis on the entire reserve weight of the sample remaining in the DEA laboratory, to provide thorough advice regarding the impact of the results of said analysis, to have further discussions with the government regarding methods of arranging the testing and settlement of the case, and to otherwise continue defense preparation in the event that the case proceeds to trial. Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree that: (1) the failure to grant the requested continuance would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary to prepare defendant's defense, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (2) time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act shall be excluded from the date of the parties' stipulation, October 23, 2013, through and including January 7, 2014, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and Local Code T4 based upon the need for additional time for defense preparation.

ORDER

UPON GOOD CAUSE SHOWN and the stipulation of all parties, it is ordered that the January 7, 2014, status conference hearing be continued to March 18, 2014, at 9:15 a.m. Based on the representation of defense counsel and good cause appearing therefrom, the Court hereby finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting a continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial. It is ordered that the time from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 4, 2014, up to and including the March 18, 2014, status conference shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this matter must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) and Local Code T-4, to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer