Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

A.T. ex rel. L.T. v. Dry Creek Joint Elementary School District, Placer County Office of Education, 2:16-cv-02925-MCE-DB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180705b77 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 03, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 03, 2018
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, JR. , District Judge . Plaintiff A.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, L.T. ("Plaintiff"), Individual Placer County Office of Education Defendants Peter Baldo, Judy Benney, Mary Boehm, Becky Bravo, Debbie Cannon, Stephanie Dillbeck, Lisa Hewitt, Liz Lee, Valerie Miller, Sandra Moore, Cyndi Stone, KD Ashton, Christy Carter, Donna Kearns, and Jen Rogers ("PCOE Individual Defendants"),
More

JOINT STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO ANSWER FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT; ORDER

Plaintiff A.T., a minor, by and through his Guardian Ad Litem, L.T. ("Plaintiff"), Individual Placer County Office of Education Defendants Peter Baldo, Judy Benney, Mary Boehm, Becky Bravo, Debbie Cannon, Stephanie Dillbeck, Lisa Hewitt, Liz Lee, Valerie Miller, Sandra Moore, Cyndi Stone, KD Ashton, Christy Carter, Donna Kearns, and Jen Rogers ("PCOE Individual Defendants"), and Individual Placer County Children's System of Care Defendants Renee Verdugo, David Moul, Lauri McNally, Carley Rose Jackson, Tammy Peterson, Rebecca Ratekin, and Wendy Devore ("CSOC Individual Defendants" and, collectively with Plaintiff and the PCOE Individual Defendants, the "Parties"), by and through their respective counsel, stipulate and agree as follows:

1. WHEREAS, the Parties previously stipulated to extending the time to respond to Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint on August 16, 2017 and defendants filed Motions to Dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint;

2. WHEREAS, the Court issued its Memorandum and Order on PCOE Individual Defendants' and CSOC Individual Defendants' respective Motions to Dismiss on June 20, 2018;

3. WHEREAS, the Parties stipulate to extending the time for Defendants to answer Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint by 28 days from July 5, 2018 to August 2, 2018.

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties jointly request and hereby stipulate that the Defendants have until and including August 2, 2018 to answer the First Amended Complaint.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The parties' stipulation above is REJECTED. Instead, not later than fourteen (14) days from the date of electronic filing of this Order, Plaintiffs are hereby ordered to file a Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") pursuant to the Court's June 20, 2018 Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 86). Defendants shall have twenty-eight (28) days from the filing of Plaintiffs' SAC to answer or otherwise respond to the complaint.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer