Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Zavalidroga, 96-cr-00146-MMC-1. (2020)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20200310a54 Visitors: 16
Filed: Mar. 09, 2020
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2020
Summary: ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FILED MARCH 2, 2020 MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . The Court is in receipt of defendant's "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b) Motion," filed March 2, 2020, whereby defendant seeks, for the twelfth time, reconsideration of the denial of his petition for a writ of coram nobis. The motion is hereby DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court's order of October 11, 2019. ( See Doc. No. 272; see, e.g. , Doc. No. 274.) If defendant elects to app
More

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT'S MOTION FILED MARCH 2, 2020

The Court is in receipt of defendant's "Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Rule 60(b) Motion," filed March 2, 2020, whereby defendant seeks, for the twelfth time, reconsideration of the denial of his petition for a writ of coram nobis.

The motion is hereby DENIED for the reasons stated in the Court's order of October 11, 2019. (See Doc. No. 272; see, e.g., Doc. No. 274.)

If defendant elects to appeal the instant order, the Court, to the extent a certificate of appealability may be required, hereby DENIES such certificate, as defendant has not made any showing, let alone a "substantial showing," that he has been denied a "constitutional right." See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer