Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Thomas, 2:20-mj-00113-EJY. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200218772 Visitors: 13
Filed: Oct. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2019
Summary: FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER ELAYNA J. YOUCHAH , Magistrate Judge . FINDINGS OF FACT Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that: 1. Counsel for the defendant needs the additional time to review discovery and to prepare for trial. 2. Counsel request the new date be designated to a date after the court's November bench trial date, currently set as November 20, 2019. 3. The defendant is not incarcerated and does
More

FINDINGS OF FACT, CONCLUSIONS OF LAW AND ORDER

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based on the pending Stipulation of counsel, and good cause appearing therefore, the Court finds that:

1. Counsel for the defendant needs the additional time to review discovery and to prepare for trial.

2. Counsel request the new date be designated to a date after the court's November bench trial date, currently set as November 20, 2019.

3. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code §§ 3161(h)(7)(B) and 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

This is the second request for a continuance of the bench trial.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

The ends of justice served by granting said continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial, since the failure to grant said continuance would be likely to result in a miscarriage of justice, would deny the parties herein sufficient time and the opportunity within which to be able to effectively and thoroughly prepare for trial, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.

The continuance sought herein is excludable under the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), when the considering the facts under Title 18, United States Code, § 316(h)(7)(B)(iv).

ORDER

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the bench trial currently scheduled on Wednesday, October 16, 2019, at 9:00 a.m., be vacated and continued to Jan. 29, 2020 at the hour of 9:00 A.m.

STIPULATION TO CONTINUE BENCH TRIAL

(Second Request)

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, by and between Nicholas A. Trutanich, United States Attorney, and Rachel Kent, Special Assistant United States Attorney, counsel for the United States of America, and Rene L. Valladares, Federal Public Defender, and Katherine Tanaka, Assistant Federal Public Defender, counsel for Wayne Thomas, that the bench trial currently scheduled on October 16, 2019 at 9:00 am, be vacated and continued to a date and time convenient to the Court, but no sooner than thirty (30) days.

This Stipulation is entered into for the following reasons:

1. Counsel for the defendant needs additional time to review received discovery and to prepare for trial.

2. Due to scheduling, both parties request the new date be designated to a date after the court's November bench trial date, currently set as November 20, 2019.

3. The defendant is not incarcerated and does not object to the continuance.

4. Additionally, denial of this request for continuance could result in a miscarriage of justice. The additional time requested by this Stipulation is excludable in computing the time within which the trial herein must commence pursuant to the Speedy Trial Act, Title 18, United States Code, Section 3161(h)(7)(A), considering the factors under Title 18, United States Code § 3161(h)(7)(B)(iv).

This is the second request for a continuance of the bench trial.

DATED this 8th day of October, 2019. RENE L. VALLADARES NICHOLAS A. TRUTANICH Federal Public Defender United States Attorney By ________ By ________ KATHERINE TANAKA RACHEL KENT Assistant Federal Public Defender Special Assistant United States Attorney
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer