Banerjee v. Continental Incorporated, Inc., 2:17-cv-00466-APG-GWF. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180307e51
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 06, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR AWARD OF MANDATORY ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND STATUTORY DAMAGES PURSUANT TO N.R.S. 41.670 (ANTI-SLAPP) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On or about February 27, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises ("Continental") and Leapers, Inc. ("Leapers") (collectively the "Defendants filed a Motion for Award of Mandatory Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Statutory Damages Pursuant to Nev.
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR AWARD OF MANDATORY ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND STATUTORY DAMAGES PURSUANT TO N.R.S. 41.670 (ANTI-SLAPP) GEORGE FOLEY, JR. , Magistrate Judge . On or about February 27, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises ("Continental") and Leapers, Inc. ("Leapers") (collectively the "Defendants filed a Motion for Award of Mandatory Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Statutory Damages Pursuant to Nev. R..
More
STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR PLAINTIFFS TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR AWARD OF MANDATORY ATTORNEY'S FEES, COSTS, AND STATUTORY DAMAGES PURSUANT TO N.R.S. § 41.670 (ANTI-SLAPP)
GEORGE FOLEY, JR., Magistrate Judge.
On or about February 27, 2018 Defendants Continental Incorporated, Inc. d/b/a Continental Enterprises ("Continental") and Leapers, Inc. ("Leapers") (collectively the "Defendants filed a Motion for Award of Mandatory Attorney's Fees, Costs, and Statutory Damages Pursuant to Nev. Rev. Stat. §41.670 (Anti-SLAPP) (EFC Doc No. 60). By stipulation, the parties extended the Plaintiff's deadline to respond to this Motion from March 13, 2018 to March 16, 2018. Defendants' time to file their reply will remain as March 20, 2018. The status hearing currently set for March 21, 2018 at 9:30 a.m. shall remain on the Court's calendar. This is the first request for extension of this deadline. Plaintiffs' counsel reasonably requires additional time to file their response due to the following reasons: Plaintiffs' counsel has recently opened his own law office and requires additional time to confer with his clients and draft the response. Counsel for Defendants agrees to this extension. Accordingly, the parties believe that extending the deadline is fair and that doing so will not prejudice any party of the Court's schedule.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
