U.S. v. SMITH, 08-cr-00287-REB-06. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20120320901
Visitors: 11
Filed: Mar. 19, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 19, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me on Defendant Nathaniel Smith's Motion To Disclose Testimony To Grand Jury Re: Second Superseding Indictment [#730] 1 filed November 22, 2011. I deny the motion as moot. On November 22, 2011, Mr. Smith filed the instant motion. On December 7, 2011, I entered an Order Permitting disclosure of Grand Jury Material [#737]. Although the order was entered in response to the Government's Ex Parte Motion for an Order Permit
Summary: ORDER ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge. The matter is before me on Defendant Nathaniel Smith's Motion To Disclose Testimony To Grand Jury Re: Second Superseding Indictment [#730] 1 filed November 22, 2011. I deny the motion as moot. On November 22, 2011, Mr. Smith filed the instant motion. On December 7, 2011, I entered an Order Permitting disclosure of Grand Jury Material [#737]. Although the order was entered in response to the Government's Ex Parte Motion for an Order Permitt..
More
ORDER
ROBERT E. BLACKBURN, District Judge.
The matter is before me on Defendant Nathaniel Smith's Motion To Disclose Testimony To Grand Jury Re: Second Superseding Indictment [#730]1 filed November 22, 2011. I deny the motion as moot.
On November 22, 2011, Mr. Smith filed the instant motion. On December 7, 2011, I entered an Order Permitting disclosure of Grand Jury Material [#737]. Although the order was entered in response to the Government's Ex Parte Motion for an Order Permitting Disclosure of Grand Jury Material [#736] filed December 7, 2011, the order effectively granted the relief requested by Mr. Smith in the instant motion.
THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Nathaniel Smith's Motion To Disclose Testimony To Grand Jury Re: Second Superseding Indictment [#730] filed November 22, 2011, is DENIED as moot.
FootNotes
1. "[#730]" is an example of the convention I use to identify the docket number assigned to a specific paper by the court's electronic case filing and management system (CM/ECF). I use this convention throughout this order.
Source: Leagle
