Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Lares, 2:16-cr-192-TLN. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161114h47
Filed: Oct. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 28, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Acting U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, through Assistant United States Attorney Katherine Lydon, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather Williams, through Assistant Federal Defender Douglas J. Beevers, attorney for defendant Hector Lares that the previously-scheduled status confere
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Acting U.S. Attorney Phillip A. Talbert, through Assistant United States Attorney Katherine Lydon, attorney for Plaintiff and Federal Defender Heather Williams, through Assistant Federal Defender Douglas J. Beevers, attorney for defendant Hector Lares that the previously-scheduled status conference date of November 17, 2016 be vacated and the matter be set for status conference on January 5, 2017 at 9:30 a.m.

The parties need additional time to obtain and review the deportation tapes to determine whether the deportation hearing complied with due process.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including January 5, 2017; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

Counsel and the defendant also agree that the ends of justice served by the Court granting this continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefore, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including January 5, 2017, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the November 17, 2016 status conference shall be continued until January 5, 2017, at 9:30 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer