Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Oaks, 18-cr-00470-PAB-11. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20190917a18 Visitors: 9
Filed: Sep. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER PHILIP A. BRIMMER , Chief District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Continue Change of Plea Hearing [Docket No. 234], wherein defendant Jason Oaks asks the Court to continue the September 20, 2019 change of plea hearing in this case for 90 days. According to the motion, the United States opposes the request. Id. at 1. On September 12, 2019, Mr. Oaks filed an appeal of the Court's order [Docket No. 232] denying his Motion for Reconsideration of Orde
More

ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant's Motion to Continue Change of Plea Hearing [Docket No. 234], wherein defendant Jason Oaks asks the Court to continue the September 20, 2019 change of plea hearing in this case for 90 days. According to the motion, the United States opposes the request. Id. at 1. On September 12, 2019, Mr. Oaks filed an appeal of the Court's order [Docket No. 232] denying his Motion for Reconsideration of Order Denying Motion for Revocation of Magistrate Judge's Detention Order [Docket No. 228]. As grounds for his motion to continue the hearing, Mr. Oaks states that, "in order to provide Defendant adequate time to appeal this Court's order and, if successful, to provide Defendant with adequate time to seek medical attention before Defendant's incarceration, Defendant requires at least 90 days from this filing." Docket No. 234 at 2. Defendant agrees with the United States that, upon pleading guilty pursuant to the parties' plea agreement, the defendant will be remanded. Id.; see also Docket No. 225 at 6.

The defendant does not cite any authority for his request. The defendant also fails to differentiate between the time it would take him to appeal the Court's order and the time necessary to obtain medical treatment if he were released. The latter consideration depends on a number of contingencies which do not provide a basis for his motion. The Court will, however, continue the change of plea hearing for approximately thirty days in order to allow the defendant to brief his appeal. Wherefore, it is

ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Continue Change of Plea Hearing [Docket No. 234] is granted in part and denied in part. It is further

ORDERED that the hearing set for September 20, 2019 at 9:00 a.m. is vacated. Counsel shall jointly contact Chambers via conference call (303-335-2794) no later than September 19, 2019 to reschedule the change of plea hearing for approximately thirty days.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer