Gibbons v. Union Pacific Railroad Company, 2:15-cv-02231-GMN-CWH. (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20180703d36
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jun. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 30, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Plaintiff Greg Gibbons ("Gibbons") and Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific"), stipulate to an extension of time from June 25, 2018 to June 28, 2018 for Union Pacific to file its Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative for Remittitur Pursuant to FRCP 59(a) (Doc. 135) and Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion to Alter or A
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST) GLORIA M. NAVARRO , District Judge . Plaintiff Greg Gibbons ("Gibbons") and Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific"), stipulate to an extension of time from June 25, 2018 to June 28, 2018 for Union Pacific to file its Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative for Remittitur Pursuant to FRCP 59(a) (Doc. 135) and Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion to Alter or Am..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME (FIRST REQUEST)
GLORIA M. NAVARRO, District Judge.
Plaintiff Greg Gibbons ("Gibbons") and Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company ("Union Pacific"), stipulate to an extension of time from June 25, 2018 to June 28, 2018 for Union Pacific to file its Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion for New Trial or in the Alternative for Remittitur Pursuant to FRCP 59(a) (Doc. 135) and Reply in Support of Union Pacific's Motion to Alter or Amend the Judgment Pursuant to FRCP 59(e) (Doc. 137). This extension is not sought for delay. This extension is a first request.
It is SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
