SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, Obie Lee Crisp, III, is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants' motion for summary judgment based on Plaintiff's failure to exhaust the available administrative remedies in compliance with 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a) was recently denied. (Docs. 56, 59.) It is, therefore, appropriate to re-open discovery and to set the following schedule for this action.
Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 1, 16, and 26-36, discovery shall proceed as follows:
1. Discovery requests shall be served by the parties pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5 and Local Rule 135. Discovery requests and responses shall not be filed with the Court unless required by Local Rules 250.2, 250.3 and 250.4.
2. Responses to written discovery requests shall be due forty-five (45) days after the request is first served. Responses to any discovery that had been served prior to the issuance of the order that stayed discovery are due forty-five (45) days from the date of service of this order.
3. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(a)(2)(B), Defendant may depose Plaintiff and any other witness confined in a prison upon condition that, at least fourteen (14) days before such a deposition, Defendant serves all parties with the notice required by Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(1). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 30(b)(4), the parties may take any deposition under this section by video conference without a further motion or order of the Court. Nothing herein forecloses a party from bringing a motion for protective order pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c)(1) if necessary.
4. If discovery disputes arise, the parties shall comply with all pertinent rules including Rules 5, 7, 11, 26, and 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Rules 110, 130, 131, 133, 135, 142, 144, and 230(1) of the Local Rules of Practice for the United States District Court, Eastern District of California. A discovery motion that does not comply with applicable rules will be stricken and may result in imposition of sanctions. However, unless otherwise ordered, Local Rule 251 shall not apply, and the requirement set forth in Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 and 37 of a good faith conference or attempt to confer with the other party to resolve the dispute shall not apply. Voluntary compliance with this provision of Rules 26 and 37 is encouraged, and if the Court deems it appropriate in any given case, it will re-impose the meet and confer requirement. A moving party should not seek to compel production of documents which are equally available to that moving party, such as documents in plaintiff's central file.
5. The deadline for amending the pleadings is November 28, 2016. Plaintiff's motions for an extension of time up to the deadline to amend pleadings to provide identifying information for service of process on Defendant Cisco
6. The deadline for the completion of all discovery, including filing all motions to compel discovery, is January 30, 2017. Absent good cause, discovery motions will not be considered if filed after the discovery deadline. Therefore, discovery requests and deposition notices must be served sufficiently in advance of the discovery deadline to permit time for a response and time to prepare and file a motion to compel.
7. The deadline for filing all dispositive motions (other than a motion for summary judgment for failure to exhaust) is March 17, 2017.
IT IS SO ORDERED.