Filed: Apr. 26, 2012
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2012
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. The Court conducted a hearing on April 26, 2012, on Defendant Auto-Owners' Motion to Strike Expert Witnesses (#82), filed March 26, 2012 and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure (#85), filed March 28, 2012. Afer discussion with the parties, the Court finds that ruling on the above discovery motions is premature. Therefore, in anticipation of Defendant Auto-Owners filing a motion for summary judgment within two weeks of this order and based on the
Summary: ORDER GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge. The Court conducted a hearing on April 26, 2012, on Defendant Auto-Owners' Motion to Strike Expert Witnesses (#82), filed March 26, 2012 and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure (#85), filed March 28, 2012. Afer discussion with the parties, the Court finds that ruling on the above discovery motions is premature. Therefore, in anticipation of Defendant Auto-Owners filing a motion for summary judgment within two weeks of this order and based on the r..
More
ORDER
GEORGE FOLEY, Jr., Magistrate Judge.
The Court conducted a hearing on April 26, 2012, on Defendant Auto-Owners' Motion to Strike Expert Witnesses (#82), filed March 26, 2012 and Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Disclosure (#85), filed March 28, 2012. Afer discussion with the parties, the Court finds that ruling on the above discovery motions is premature. Therefore, in anticipation of Defendant Auto-Owners filing a motion for summary judgment within two weeks of this order and based on the reasonable likelihood that the motion may be granted, the Court will stay all discovery in this matter until decision on that motion. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that discovery in the matter is stayed pending decision on Defendant Auto-Owners' forthcoming motion for summary judgment.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report within one week of a decision on the motion for summary judgment regarding the status of the pending discovery motions in light of the Court's ruling.
