Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Pratt, 2:16-CR-236-JAM. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180130c25 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between plaintiff United States of America, on the one hand, and defendant Alexander Aaron Pratt, on the other hand, through their respective undersigned attorneys, that the presently set January 30, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued by the Court to February 27, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., to allow
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTINUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME UNDER THE SPEEDY TRIAL ACT

It is hereby stipulated and agreed by and between plaintiff United States of America, on the one hand, and defendant Alexander Aaron Pratt, on the other hand, through their respective undersigned attorneys, that the presently set January 30, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued by the Court to February 27, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., to allow defense counsel additional time to review discovery produced by the United States, conduct counsel's independent investigation into the facts and applicable law, interview witnesses, discuss with counsel's client potential pretrial resolution, and otherwise prepare client's defense.

As additional detail, the United States has tendered a written plea agreement to defense counsel, Donald Heller, Esq. Mr. Heller needs to spend some time with his client who resides in the State of Idaho to explain and review the case with his client and available options. However, both Pratt and one of his children have contracted influenza and are very sick at this time. From the defense perspective, additional time is required for: (1) Pratt (and anyone else in his household who has or might contract influenza for whom he must provide care) to recover from this illness before Pratt can travel from Idaho to California; (2) Pratt to meet with Mr. Heller so that Mr. Heller can fully explain the negotiated plea agreement; and (3) Pratt to attend court to enter his guilty plea, if that is what Pratt wants to do.

The parties agree and request the Court find that: (1) defendant Pratt is unavailable for trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(3)(A) and (B) and Local Rule M due to his illness and the illness of those members of his household for whom he must provide care; (2) the failure to grant this requested continuance would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (3) the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The parties further agree and request that the Court order for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which the trial of this case must commence, the time period from the date of this stipulation, January 25, 2018, to and including the February 27, 2018, status conference hearing, shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(3)(A) and (B), and Local Code M as defendant Pratt is unavailable for trial as explained above, and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv), and Local Code T4 to allow defense counsel reasonable time to prepare his client's defenses.

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its Order. It is hereby ORDERED that the presently set January 30, 2018, at 9:15 a.m., status conference hearing shall be continued to February 27, 2018, at 9:15 a.m.

Based on the representations of the parties in their stipulation, the Court finds that: (1) defendant Alexander Aaron Pratt is unavailable for trial within the meaning of 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(3)(A) and (B) and Local Rule M due to his illness and the illness of those members of his household for whom he must provide care; (2) the failure to grant this requested continuance would deny defense counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence; and (3) the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the best interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court hereby orders that for the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which the trial of this case must commence, the time period from the date of the parties' stipulation, January 25, 2018, to and including the February 27, 2018, status conference hearing, shall be excluded pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § § 3161(h)(3)(A) and (B), and Local Code M as defendant Pratt is unavailable for trial as explained in the parties' stipulation, and 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and B(iv) and Local Code T4 to allow defense counsel reasonable time necessary to prepare his client's defenses.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer