Williams v. Riley, 2:16-CV-3002-JAM-DMC-P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180919935
Visitors: 17
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Process was returned executed as to all defendants on January 16, 2018. See Doc. 18. On August 30, 2018, the court denied defendants' motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 151(b). See Doc. 28. Defendants are now directed to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Process was returned executed as to all defendants on January 16, 2018. See Doc. 18. On August 30, 2018, the court denied defendants' motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 151(b). See Doc. 28. Defendants are now directed to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within 3..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Process was returned executed as to all defendants on January 16, 2018. See Doc. 18. On August 30, 2018, the court denied defendants' motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 151(b). See Doc. 28. Defendants are now directed to file a response to plaintiff's complaint within 30 days of the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
