Gifford v. Kampa, 2:17-CV-2421-TLN-DMC. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190911b27
Filed: Sep. 10, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 10, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court are defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24 and 25) and defendants Winston's motions to strike (ECF No. 25) and for an order requiring plaintiff to post security (ECF No. 26). All motions are set for hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 11, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. On August 19, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement waiving oral argumen
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court are defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24 and 25) and defendants Winston's motions to strike (ECF No. 25) and for an order requiring plaintiff to post security (ECF No. 26). All motions are set for hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 11, 2019, at 10:00 a.m. On August 19, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement waiving oral argument..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding pro se, brings this civil action. Pending before the court are defendants' motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 24 and 25) and defendants Winston's motions to strike (ECF No. 25) and for an order requiring plaintiff to post security (ECF No. 26). All motions are set for hearing before the undersigned in Redding, California, on September 11, 2019, at 10:00 a.m.
On August 19, 2019, plaintiff filed a statement waiving oral argument on all motions except defendant Winston's motion to strike. Because such motions have been fully briefed and because plaintiff has waived the opportunity to challenge the motions to dismiss and motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security at the hearing, the court finds oral argument on such motions unnecessary. Pursuant to Eastern District of California Local Rule 230(g), defendants' motions to dismiss and defendant Winston's motion for an order requiring plaintiff to post security are, therefore, submitted on the briefs without oral argument. The hearing in this matter set for September 11, 2019, shall be limited to arguments related to defendant Winston's motion to strike.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
