(SS) Martinez v. Commissioner of Social Security, 2:16-CV-0101-CMK. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180130b99
Visitors: 7
Filed: Jan. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 26, 2018
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On June 9, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file a dispositive motion. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now filed his dispositive motion. Accordingly, the order t
Summary: ORDER CRAIG M. KELLISON , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On June 9, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file a dispositive motion. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now filed his dispositive motion. Accordingly, the order to..
More
ORDER
CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, who is proceeding with retained counsel, brings this action under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) for judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. On June 9, 2017, the court directed plaintiff to show cause in writing why this action should not be dismissed for plaintiff's failure to file a dispositive motion. A review of the docket reflects that plaintiff has now filed his dispositive motion. Accordingly, the order to show cause is hereby discharged.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
