Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

POP MIDDLE EAST, INC. v. POPSUGAR INC., C 17-02015 WHA. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170519926 Visitors: 22
Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: May 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac
More

ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD

The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as "the bar of New York" — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer