POP MIDDLE EAST, INC. v. POPSUGAR INC., C 17-02015 WHA. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170519926
Visitors: 22
Filed: May 17, 2017
Latest Update: May 17, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac
Summary: ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD WILLIAM ALSUP , District Judge . The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar " (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac ..
More
ORDER DENYING PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION OF ATTORNEY EDWARD
WILLIAM ALSUP, District Judge.
The pro hac vice application of Attorney Edward Klaris (Dkt. No. 6) is DENIED for failing to comply with Local Rule 11-3. The local rule requires that an applicant certify that "he or she is an active member in good standing of the bar of a United States Court or of the highest court of another State or the District of Columbia, specifying such bar" (emphasis added). Filling out the pro hac vice form from the district court website such that it only identifies the state of bar membership — such as "the bar of New York" — is inadequate under the local rule because it fails to identify a specific court. While the application fee does not need to be paid again, the application cannot be processed until a corrected form is submitted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle