MORRISON v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, C12-04923 RS. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130607774
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John Morrison by and through his attorney of record, David M. Kindopp, Esq. of Law Offices of David M. Kindopp and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH
Summary: STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1) RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John Morrison by and through his attorney of record, David M. Kindopp, Esq. of Law Offices of David M. Kindopp and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH ..
More
STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL; [PROPOSED] ORDER [Fed. Rule Civ. Proc., Rule 41(a)(1)
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by plaintiff John Morrison by and through his attorney of record, David M. Kindopp, Esq. of Law Offices of David M. Kindopp and defendant State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company through their attorney of record Stephen P. Ellingson of Hayes Scott Bonino Ellingson & McLay, LLP, that the above-captioned action be, and hereby is, DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 41(a)(1).
[PROPOSED] ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
