Fridman v. Uber Technologies, Inc., 18-cv-02815-HSG. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180919a33
Filed: Sep. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2018
Summary: RELATED CASE ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to case I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reass
Summary: RELATED CASE ORDER HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to case I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassi..
More
RELATED CASE ORDER
HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.
A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to case
I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination.
Case Title Related Not Related
18-cv-04538-TSH Bollinger v. Uber Technologies, Inc. X
ORDER
The parties are instructed that all future filings in any reassigned case are to bear the initials of the newly assigned judge immediately after the case number. Any case management conference in any reassigned case will be rescheduled by the Court. The parties shall adjust the dates for the conference, disclosures and report required by FRCivP 16 and 26 accordingly. Unless otherwise ordered, any dates for hearing noticed motions are vacated and must be renoticed by the moving party before the newly assigned judge; any deadlines set by the ADR Local Rules remain in effect; and any deadlines established in a case management order continue to govern, except dates for appearance in court, which will be rescheduled by the newly assigned judge.
Source: Leagle
