MARYELLEN NOREIKA, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on February 1, 2019, Magistrate Judge Fallon issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 66) in this action, which recommended that the Court grant Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 50)
WHEREAS, no party filed objections to the Report and Recommendation pursuant to 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in the prescribed period, and the Court finding no clear error on the face of the record.
THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED this 19th day of February 2019 that the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (D.I. 50) is GRANTED.
Plaintiff's claims for strict liability, negligence, and breach of express and implied warranties and the associated demand for an award of punitive damages (Count I) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff's claim for failure to warn and the associated demand for an award of punitive damages (Count III) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff's claim for civil conspiracy and the associated demand for an award of punitive damages (Count IV) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff's claims for loss of consortium and the associated demand for an award of punitive damages (Count V) are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.
Plaintiff is given leave to file an Amended Complaint within fifteen (15) days of the date of this Order to correct the deficiencies outlined in the Report and Recommendation. Failure to file an Amended Complaint will result in the dismissal of the Defendants as defined above (see supra n.1).
Plaintiff's claim of marketing an ultra-hazardous product and the associated demand for an award of punitive damages (Count II) are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.