Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the government to set a trial date of June 11, 2012, in the Charlotte Division. (Doc. No. 453). The Court finds that setting a date certain is in the interest of justice based on the complexity of this matter and number of witnesses expected to testify. However, given the expected length of the trial, the Court is unable to conduct it during the week requested. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that t
Summary: ORDER ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the government to set a trial date of June 11, 2012, in the Charlotte Division. (Doc. No. 453). The Court finds that setting a date certain is in the interest of justice based on the complexity of this matter and number of witnesses expected to testify. However, given the expected length of the trial, the Court is unable to conduct it during the week requested. IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that th..
More
ORDER
ROBERT J. CONRAD, Jr., Chief District Judge.
THIS MATTER is before the Court upon motion of the government to set a trial date of June 11, 2012, in the Charlotte Division. (Doc. No. 453).
The Court finds that setting a date certain is in the interest of justice based on the complexity of this matter and number of witnesses expected to testify. However, given the expected length of the trial, the Court is unable to conduct it during the week requested.
IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. The proof in this trial will not begin before June 25, 2012. The Court may conduct jury selection in advance of that date, depending on the scheduling of other matters.
The Clerk is directed to certify copies of this order to the defendant, counsel for the defendant, the United States Attorney, and the United States Marshal.
