Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

USA v. Ramirez, 1:17-MJ-00168-SAB. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180126f93 Visitors: 15
Filed: Jan. 25, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 25, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . BACKGROUND On January 24, 2018, defendant filed a Motion to Suppress (DE 9). Local Rules 430.1(d) and (e) sets forth a general limit of seven days for any party to file a response in opposition to such motions, and three days for the moving party to file a reply. However, the parties in this case require additional time to brief and file such pleadings. THE
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER SETTING FORTH BRIEFING SCHEDULE REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO SUPPRESS

BACKGROUND

On January 24, 2018, defendant filed a Motion to Suppress (DE 9). Local Rules 430.1(d) and (e) sets forth a general limit of seven days for any party to file a response in opposition to such motions, and three days for the moving party to file a reply. However, the parties in this case require additional time to brief and file such pleadings.

THEREFORE, defendant Jose Luis Ramirez, Jr., by and through his counsel Andrew Wong, and plaintiff the United States of America, by and through its counsel, Special Assistant United States Attorney Darin Rock, hereby stipulate and agree to the following briefing schedule and request that the Court enter an order reflecting that schedule:

1. Any opposition by the United States must be filed on or before February 15, 2018. 2. Any reply by the defendant must be filed on or before March 8, 2018. 3. The Status Conference set for February 15, 2018, be continued until 10 a.m., March 22, 2018.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer