Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Robert Eugene Martin, 11-12575 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 11-12575 Visitors: 36
Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-12575 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JUNE 7, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 7, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Ost
More
                                                             [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                         FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                          ________________________           FILED
                                                    U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
                                 No. 11-12575         ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                             Non-Argument Calendar        JUNE 7, 2012
                           ________________________        JOHN LEY
                                                            CLERK
                   D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.
                          ________________________

                   Appeal from the United States District Court
                       for the Middle District of Florida
                         ________________________

                                  (June 7, 2012)

Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

      Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Robert Eugene Martin in this

direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 
87 S. Ct. 1396
, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because an

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martin’s convictions and

sentences are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer