Filed: Jun. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-12575 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JUNE 7, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 7, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Ost
Summary: [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ FILED U.S. COURT OF APPEALS No. 11-12575 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT Non-Argument Calendar JUNE 7, 2012 _ JOHN LEY CLERK D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (June 7, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: Thomas H. Ostr..
More
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________ FILED
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
No. 11-12575 ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
Non-Argument Calendar JUNE 7, 2012
________________________ JOHN LEY
CLERK
D.C. Docket No. 8:10-cr-00305-VMC-AEP-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
ROBERT EUGENE MARTIN,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(June 7, 2012)
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Thomas H. Ostrander, appointed counsel for Robert Eugene Martin in this
direct criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the
appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct.
1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals
that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because an
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Martin’s convictions and
sentences are AFFIRMED.
2