Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RYGG v. BERRYHILL, 2:16-cv-02737-JAM-CKD. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170421e28 Visitors: 22
Filed: Apr. 20, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 20, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the plaintiff's time to file her Motion for Summary Judgment herein is hereby extended for a period of 35 days. Plaintiff's Motion is due Friday, April 28. This request, if approved, would extend the filing date to Friday, Ju
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER EXTENDING PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties, through their respective counsel, and subject to the approval of the Court, that the plaintiff's time to file her Motion for Summary Judgment herein is hereby extended for a period of 35 days. Plaintiff's Motion is due Friday, April 28. This request, if approved, would extend the filing date to Friday, June 2.

This 35 day extension is requested because of the workload on other court matters, and current difficulties resulting from severe allergies, as well as a two week vacation scheduled for May by attorney Ralph Wilborn, who is assisting plaintiff's lead attorney in this matter. This is plaintiff's first request for an extension of time.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer