Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Cardoza v. Bloomin' Brands, Inc., 2:13-cv-01820-JAD-NJK. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20150218c13 Visitors: 11
Filed: Feb. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Feb. 17, 2015
Summary: EXPEDITED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONSENT-TO-JOIN FORMS JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge. Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the "parties"), through and by their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to modify the Notice of Collective Action and Consent-to-Join forms previously approved by the Court. The proposed modified Notice of Collective Action form is attached as Exhibit 1, and the proposed modified Consent-to-J
More

EXPEDITED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO MODIFY NOTICE OF COLLECTIVE ACTION AND CONSENT-TO-JOIN FORMS

JENNIFER A. DORSEY, District Judge.

Pursuant to LR 7-1, Plaintiffs and Defendants (collectively, the "parties"), through and by their respective counsel, hereby jointly stipulate to modify the Notice of Collective Action and Consent-to-Join forms previously approved by the Court. The proposed modified Notice of Collective Action form is attached as Exhibit 1, and the proposed modified Consent-to-Join form is attached as Exhibit 2.

The parties file this stipulation at Plaintiffs' request in order to modify the current notice by including the contact information for the third-party administrator that will furnish the Notice of Collective Action and Consent-to-Join forms and receive and process the Consent-to-Join forms from opt-in plaintiffs. The other minor modification to the notice includes an instruction for Spanish speakers regarding how to obtain a Spanish-translated copy of the modified notice. The proposed Spanish-translated copies of the modified Notice of Collective Action and the Consent-to-Join are attached respectively as Exhibits 3 and 4. The voice recording script for Spanish speakers requesting the Spanish-translated copy of the modified notice has been approved by the parties. Finally, the modification to the Consent-to-Join form is solely for the third-party administrator to process returned Consent-to-Join forms.

In sum, the modifications are purely for administrative practicality and do not modify any substantive aspect of the forms previously approved by the Court's Order [ECF Doc. 151]. Plaintiffs request expedited treatment of this stipulation and proposed order so that dissemination of the notice is not delayed. Plaintiffs consulted with Defendants and the parties have adopted all of the proposed changes.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer