Jacobsen v. Rushmore Loan Management Services, LLC, 3:19-cv-00017-MMD-WGC. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190226d62
Visitors: 1
Filed: Feb. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendants RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ("Rushmore"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT ("RMAC Trust"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("US Bank"); and CLEAR RECON CORP ("Clear Recon" and collectively "Defendants") by and through their counsel of record, Aldridge Pite, LLP, hereby move for
Summary: ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF (First Request) MIRANDA M. DU , District Judge . Defendants RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ("Rushmore"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT ("RMAC Trust"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("US Bank"); and CLEAR RECON CORP ("Clear Recon" and collectively "Defendants") by and through their counsel of record, Aldridge Pite, LLP, hereby move for ..
More
ORDER GRANTING
MOTION TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE REPLY BRIEF
(First Request)
MIRANDA M. DU, District Judge.
Defendants RUSHMORE LOAN MANAGEMENT SERVICES, LLC ("Rushmore"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, NOT IN ITS INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY BUT SOLELY AS TRUSTEE FOR THE RMAC TRUST, SERIES 2016-CTT ("RMAC Trust"); U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION ("US Bank"); and CLEAR RECON CORP ("Clear Recon" and collectively "Defendants") by and through their counsel of record, Aldridge Pite, LLP, hereby move for additional time to submit their Reply brief in support of their Motion to Dismiss, which was filed on February 1, 2019. (See ECF No. 3). This is Defendants' first request.
Defendants submit that good cause exists to extend the existing Reply deadline, which is February 22, 2019. Although Plaintiff's Response to Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 6) was purportedly served by mail on February 12, Defendants' counsel did not receive a copy of the Response until February 19 when the Court sent a notice of e-filing. As such, Defendants respectfully request that the Court afford Defendants the full seven days to file their Reply through February 26, 2019 in accordance with LR 7-2(b). This request is not being brought in bad faith or for purposes of delaying the briefing on the matter, but rather is being brought to assist Defendants' counsel with ordinary case management practice as contemplated by the local rules.
Source: Leagle
