Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

J.Z.A. v. Centura Health Corporation, 19-cv-02369-CMA-SKC. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20191219a38 Visitors: 2
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS THE UNITED STATES AS A PARTY AND REMAND THE CASE TO BOULDER COUNTY COMBINED COURT CHRISTINE M. ARGUELLO , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the United States as a Party and Remand this case to Boulder County Combined Court (Doc. # 64). Having reviewed the Motion, pertinent record, and relevant law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that good cause exists to grant the Motion and rem
More

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S UNOPPOSED MOTION TO DISMISS THE UNITED STATES AS A PARTY AND REMAND THE CASE TO BOULDER COUNTY COMBINED COURT

This matter is before the Court on Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the United States as a Party and Remand this case to Boulder County Combined Court (Doc. # 64). Having reviewed the Motion, pertinent record, and relevant law, the Court agrees with Plaintiff that good cause exists to grant the Motion and remand this action to the Boulder County Combined Court.

Consonant with the United States Supreme Court's Carnegie-Mellon University v. Cohill decision, this Court has "discretion under the doctrine of pendent jurisdiction to remand a properly removed case to state court when all federal-law claims in the action have been eliminated and only pendent state-law claims remain." 484 U.S. 343, 357 (1988). In light of Plaintiff's request to dismiss with prejudice the Federal Tort Claims Act claim against the United States and to dismiss without prejudice "any other claim against the United States, based on the acts or omissions of any other individual who is a deemed Public Health Service employee," no federal law claims remain in this case. (Doc. # 64 at 2.) Indeed, upon such dismissal, only state law negligence claims endure. As such, in the interest of accommodating "values of economy, convenience, [and] fairness" and the principle of "comity to the States[,]" Cohill, 484 U.S. at 350, this Court exercises its discretion to remand this action to the Boulder County Combined Court.

Accordingly, the Court ORDERS as follows:

1. Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion to Dismiss the United States as a Party and Remand this case to Boulder County Combined Court (Doc. # 64) is GRANTED. It is

2. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Second Claim for Relief (Doc. # 5 at ¶¶ 159-165) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE and the United States of America is DISMISSED as a party to the instant action. It is

3. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is REMANDED to the Boulder County Combined Court for the State of Colorado for further proceedings.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer