Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Federal National Mortgage Association v. Park, 2:17-cv-01508-APG-PAL. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20180328e54 Visitors: 6
Filed: Mar. 26, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . Plaintiff FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ("Fannie Mae"), and Defendant JONG BEOM PARK ("Park"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Fannie Mae's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) as follows: 1. Fannie Mae filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 28, 201
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE FOR REPLY IN SUPPORT OF MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

Plaintiff FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION ("Fannie Mae"), and Defendant JONG BEOM PARK ("Park"), by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby stipulate and agree to extend the deadline for Fannie Mae's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 17) as follows:

1. Fannie Mae filed its Motion for Summary Judgment on February 28, 2018. (See ECF No. 17).

2. Park filed his Response/Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment on March 12, 2018. (See ECF No. 18).

3. Fannie Mae's Reply in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment is currently due on March 26, 2018.

4. Due to the volume of litigated cases involving Fannie Mae, and scheduling conflicts with such other cases, Fannie Mae is unable to comply with the current Reply brief deadline.

5. Accordingly, Fannie Mae and Park agree to extend the Reply brief deadline one week through April 2, 2018.

6. Fannie Mae and Park enter into this stipulation in good faith, and not for purposes of undue delay.

IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer