Filed: Dec. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 6, 2019, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on the ground that he qualifies as a three-strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). See ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has not responded to defendants' motion. Plaintiff's opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to defenda
Summary: ORDER ALLISON CLAIRE , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. On November 6, 2019, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on the ground that he qualifies as a three-strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). See ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has not responded to defendants' motion. Plaintiff's opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to defendan..
More
ORDER
ALLISON CLAIRE, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On November 6, 2019, defendants filed a motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status on the ground that he qualifies as a three-strikes litigant under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See ECF No. 30. Plaintiff has not responded to defendants' motion.
Plaintiff's opposition (or statement of non-opposition) to defendants' motion was due within twenty-one (21) days after service of the motion. See Local Rule 230(l). Granting three additional days for service of defendants' motion on plaintiff by mail, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 6(d), the deadline for plaintiff to submit his opposition to prison authorities for mailing1 was Monday, December 2, 2019.2 Even allowing an additional week for mailing and docketing, it is apparent that plaintiff has not responded to defendants' motion.
Plaintiff is informed of the following legal authority. Local Rule 230(l) provides: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion." Local Rule 110 provides that failure to comply with the Local Rules "may be grounds for imposition of any and all sanctions authorized by statute or Rule or within the inherent power of the Court." Rule 41(b), Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, authorizes the involuntary dismissal of a claim or action due to plaintiff's failure to prosecute.
Plaintiff will be given one additional opportunity to respond to defendants' motion. Failure to file and serve a response will be construed as plaintiff's non-opposition thereto, resulting in a recommendation that the motion be granted and plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff shall, on or before Friday, January 3, 2019, file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion to revoke plaintiff's in forma pauperis status, OR file and serve a statement of non-opposition to defendants' motion.
2. Defendants may file and serve a reply within seven (7) days after service of plaintiff's opposition.
3. Should plaintiff fail to timely file and serve an opposition to defendants' motion, the undersigned will recommend to the district judge that defendants' motion be granted and plaintiff's in forma pauperis status be revoked.
