Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Cortes v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A., 1:17-cv-01562-LJO-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180215942 Visitors: 22
Filed: Feb. 14, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 14, 2018
Summary: SCHEDULING ORDER RE: PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS ECF No. 5 LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Martin J. Cortes, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. ECF No. 1. On November 28, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss this action, setting the hearing date for January 17, 2018. ECF No. 5. Based on the local rules, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion was due on or before January 3, 2018. Local Rule 230(c). On January 17
More

SCHEDULING ORDER RE: PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS

ECF No. 5

Plaintiff Martin J. Cortes, proceeding pro se, brings this action against Defendant JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. ECF No. 1. On November 28, 2017, Defendant filed a motion to dismiss this action, setting the hearing date for January 17, 2018. ECF No. 5. Based on the local rules, Plaintiff's opposition to Defendant's motion was due on or before January 3, 2018. Local Rule 230(c). On January 17, 2018, Plaintiff filed a notice of change of address. ECF No. 13. To date, Plaintiff has not filed any response to Defendant's motion. Because there has been some confusion regarding Plaintiff's address, the Court issues this order in an abundance of caution to permit him ten (10) days to respond to Defendant's motion to dismiss. Plaintiff shall have until on or before Friday, February 23, 2018 to file any such response. If no opposition is filed on or before that date, the Court will rule on motion.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer