Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SAMUELS v. DAVIS, 14-cv-02588-LTB-KLM. (2015)

Court: District Court, D. Colorado Number: infdco20150623960 Visitors: 23
Filed: Jun. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER LEWIS T. BABCOCK , District Judge . The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc 15) be granted and that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 10) be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff has filed specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Defendants Warden Davis, Baldwin, Baroni, Fisher, Johnson, Bynes, Sturgeon, Kaspar, Kammerzell, Eglinton, Hansen, and Nancy Davis have filed their response to the Plaintiff's objections.
More

ORDER

The Magistrate Judge recommends that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc 15) be granted and that Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 10) be dismissed with prejudice. The Plaintiff has filed specific written objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation. The Defendants Warden Davis, Baldwin, Baroni, Fisher, Johnson, Bynes, Sturgeon, Kaspar, Kammerzell, Eglinton, Hansen, and Nancy Davis have filed their response to the Plaintiff's objections. Defendant Thomas C. Fisher, M.D., has filed his independent response to the Plaintiff's objections. Finally, Plaintiff has filed his reply in support of his objections to the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation of dismissal.

Accordingly, I have reviewed the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation de novo in light of the file and record in this case. On de novo review, I conclude that the Magistrate Judge's Recommendation is correct. Accordingly

IT IS ORDERED that the Defendants' Motion to Dismiss (Doc 15) is GRANTED and Plaintiff's Amended Complaint (Doc 10) is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer