KESSLER v. TARGET CORPORATION, 14-cv-00733-BNB-MEH. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Colorado
Number: infdco20140811815
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Aug. 07, 2014
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Designation of Non-Party at Fault [Doc. # 26, filed 6/2/2014] (the "Motion to Strike"); and (2) Plainfiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply [Doc. #30, filed 7/2/2014] (the "Motion to Reply"). I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to S
Summary: ORDER BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge. This matter arises on the following: (1) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Designation of Non-Party at Fault [Doc. # 26, filed 6/2/2014] (the "Motion to Strike"); and (2) Plainfiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply [Doc. #30, filed 7/2/2014] (the "Motion to Reply"). I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record, IT IS ORDERED: (1) The Motion to St..
More
ORDER
BOYD N. BOLAND, Magistrate Judge.
This matter arises on the following:
(1) Plaintiff's Motion to Strike Defendant's Designation of Non-Party at Fault [Doc. # 26, filed 6/2/2014] (the "Motion to Strike"); and
(2) Plainfiff's Motion for Leave to File Reply [Doc. #30, filed 7/2/2014] (the "Motion to Reply").
I held a hearing on the motions this morning and made rulings on the record, which are incorporated here. For the reasons stated on the record,
IT IS ORDERED:
(1) The Motion to Strike [Doc. # 26] is DENIED; and
(2) The Motion to Reply [Doc. # 30] is GRANTED.
Source: Leagle
