Filed: Oct. 05, 2015
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2015
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant EKS&H, LLLP's ("EKS&H") request for Court approved forms of judgment ("Request") in response to the Court's prior order (ECF No. 63) denying a substantially similar request (ECF No. 62). (ECF No. 64.) All other Defendants joined in EKS&H's Request. (ECF No. 64 at 1.) To date Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Request ( see generally Dkt.). For the below stated reasons, the Court GRANTS EKS&H's
Summary: ORDER RAYMOND P. MOORE , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on Defendant EKS&H, LLLP's ("EKS&H") request for Court approved forms of judgment ("Request") in response to the Court's prior order (ECF No. 63) denying a substantially similar request (ECF No. 62). (ECF No. 64.) All other Defendants joined in EKS&H's Request. (ECF No. 64 at 1.) To date Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Request ( see generally Dkt.). For the below stated reasons, the Court GRANTS EKS&H's R..
More
ORDER
RAYMOND P. MOORE, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant EKS&H, LLLP's ("EKS&H") request for Court approved forms of judgment ("Request") in response to the Court's prior order (ECF No. 63) denying a substantially similar request (ECF No. 62). (ECF No. 64.) All other Defendants joined in EKS&H's Request. (ECF No. 64 at 1.) To date Plaintiffs have not filed a response to the Request (see generally Dkt.).
For the below stated reasons, the Court GRANTS EKS&H's Request.
Under Rule 58(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, a party may request that a judgment be set out in a separate document. Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(d). That is the nature of EKS&H's Request. (ECF No. 62.)
On April 13, 2015, the Court entered an order (ECF No. 59) awarding (1) Defendants Kermit Allard, Robert Klick, and Allard Klick & Company, LLC (collectively "Allard Defendants") attorneys' fees and costs in total of $35,759.00; (2) EKS&H attorneys' fees and costs in total of $45,067.94; and (3) Defendant Dave Zamzow ("Zamzow") attorneys' fees in the amount of $15,631.00. The Court awarded these amounts against all Plaintiffs jointly and severally and payable within thirty days. (ECF No. 59 at 8.)
Defendants request that the Court enter an order approving the forms of judgment at the applicable interest rate (ECF Nos. 64-2; 64-3; 64-4). The forms of judgment are sufficient because they identify the date on which the interest begins to accrue. (See generally ECF Nos. 64-2; 64-3; 64-4.) "Post-judgment interest begins to accrue on a judgment for attorneys[`] fees on the date the fees were meaningfully ascertained and included in a final appealable judgment." Jane L. v. Bangerter, 920 F.Supp. 1202, 1206 (D. Colo. 1996) (citation omitted). In this matter, such date occurred when the Court issued its April 13, 2015 order (ECF No. 59). See MidAmerica Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Shearson/Am. Exp. Inc., 862 F.2d 1470, 1475-76 (10th Cir. 1992).
Based on the foregoing, the Court:
(1) GRANTS EKS&H's Request to approve the tendered forms of judgment (ECF No. 64); and
(2) DIRECTS the Clerk of the Court to enter JUDGMENT as set forth in Defendants' proposed judgment forms (ECF Nos. 64-2; 64-3; 64-4).
