U.S. v. Adams, 3:17-cr-00294-rs. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181009995
Visitors: 5
Filed: Oct. 05, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 05, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE SENTENCING RICHARD SEABORG , District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to continue sentencing hearing, presently set for October 23, 2018, be continued to December 4, 2018 . This request is being made because Defense counsel needs more time to properly prepare for Sentencing. In addition, the Probation Officer assigned to this case has left the office and the new Probation Officer Joan Vazquez — Santiago has no objection to
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE SENTENCING RICHARD SEABORG , District Judge . THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to continue sentencing hearing, presently set for October 23, 2018, be continued to December 4, 2018 . This request is being made because Defense counsel needs more time to properly prepare for Sentencing. In addition, the Probation Officer assigned to this case has left the office and the new Probation Officer Joan Vazquez — Santiago has no objection to ..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE SENTENCING
RICHARD SEABORG, District Judge.
THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE AND AGREE to continue sentencing hearing, presently set for October 23, 2018, be continued to December 4, 2018 .
This request is being made because Defense counsel needs more time to properly prepare for Sentencing. In addition, the Probation Officer assigned to this case has left the office and the new Probation Officer Joan Vazquez — Santiago has no objection to this request. The parties verified with the courtroom deputy that the court is available on that date.
Wherefore, based on the files and records in this case and for the reason presented above, the Parties stipulate and agree a continuance of the sentencing hearing to December 4th will allow reasonable time necessary for all parties; and that an Order issue excluding time between October 23, 2018 and December 4, 2018, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. section 3161(h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv), where the ends of justice served by this continuance outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
