Filed: Jul. 25, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-14228 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14228 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80060-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARFIELD BIRMINGHAM, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 25, 2012) Before CARNES,
Summary: Case: 11-14228 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-14228 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80060-DMM-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee, versus GARFIELD BIRMINGHAM, llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida _ (July 25, 2012) Before CARNES, W..
More
Case: 11-14228 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-14228
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 9:11-cr-80060-DMM-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
GARFIELD BIRMINGHAM,
llllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllllll Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Southern District of Florida
________________________
(July 25, 2012)
Before CARNES, WILSON and FAY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
Gary Kollin, appointed counsel for Garfield Birmingham, has filed a motion
to withdraw on appeal, supported by a brief prepared pursuant to Anders v.
Case: 11-14228 Date Filed: 07/25/2012 Page: 2 of 2
California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent
review of the entire record reveals that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit
of the appeal is correct. Because independent examination of the entire record
reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED,
and Birmingham’s conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.
2