West v. EHealth, Inc., 15-cv-00360-JD. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160531d26
Visitors: 18
Filed: May 27, 2016
Latest Update: May 27, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES DONATO , District Judge . On March 14, 2016, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in this case for failure to state a claim under the pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), 15 U.S.C. 78u-4. Dkt. No. 41. The lead plaintiff has advised the Court that it will not seek to amend and submits to the order of dismissal. Dkt. No. 47. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment for defendants eHeal
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES DONATO , District Judge . On March 14, 2016, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in this case for failure to state a claim under the pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), 15 U.S.C. 78u-4. Dkt. No. 41. The lead plaintiff has advised the Court that it will not seek to amend and submits to the order of dismissal. Dkt. No. 47. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment for defendants eHealt..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
On March 14, 2016, the Court dismissed the consolidated complaint in this case for failure to state a claim under the pleading standards of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 ("PSLRA"), 15 U.S.C. § 78u-4. Dkt. No. 41. The lead plaintiff has advised the Court that it will not seek to amend and submits to the order of dismissal. Dkt. No. 47. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58, the Court enters judgment for defendants eHealth, Inc., Gary L. Lauer, and Stuart M. Huizinga.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
