Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

RODMAN v. SAFEWAY INC., 11-03003 JST (JCS). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160429a58 Visitors: 20
Filed: Apr. 28, 2016
Latest Update: Apr. 28, 2016
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS JON S. TIGAR , District Judge . Plaintiff Michael Rodman on behalf of himself and the certified Class ("Plaintiff") and Defendant, Safeway Inc. ("Safeway") stipulate as follows: WHEREAS, the Court entered final judgment (Dkt. No. 406) in favor of Plaintiff for breach of contract damages plus pre-judgment interest and against Safeway Inc. ("Safeway"); WHEREAS, Safeway filed a notice of a
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER REGARDING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SANCTIONS

Plaintiff Michael Rodman on behalf of himself and the certified Class ("Plaintiff") and Defendant, Safeway Inc. ("Safeway") stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court entered final judgment (Dkt. No. 406) in favor of Plaintiff for breach of contract damages plus pre-judgment interest and against Safeway Inc. ("Safeway");

WHEREAS, Safeway filed a notice of appeal (Dkt. No. 408), which appeal is pending before the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit;

WHEREAS, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Sanctions on April 6, 2016 (Dkt. No. 434);

WHEREAS, Safeway's opposition is currently due on May 4, 2016 and Plaintiff's reply is currently due on May 25, 2016 (Dkt. No. 432);

WHEREAS, the parties have agreed to a one week extension for each of their respective deadlines; and

WHEREAS, the agreement leaves more than two weeks between Plaintiff's reply and the previously scheduled hearing date, which the parties are not seeking to change.

NOW, THEREFORE, the parties to the above-captioned action hereby stipulate and agree that, subject to approval by the Court, the deadlines for Plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions shall be modified as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed New Date Deadline for Safeway to May 4, 2016 May 11, 2016 respond Plaintiff's reply May 25, 2016 June 4, 2016 Hearing on Plaintiff's motion June 16, 2016 No change for sanctions

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

Good cause appearing therefore, PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS ORDERED THAT the deadlines for Plaintiff's motion for sanctions are modified as follows:

Event Current Date Proposed New Date Deadline for Safeway to May 4, 2016 May 11, 2016 respond Plaintiff's reply May 25, 2016 June 4, 2016 June 1, 2016 Hearing on Plaintiff's motion June 16, 2016 No change for sanctions

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer