O'CONNOR v. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., 13-cv-03826-EMC. (2017)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20170925951
Visitors: 19
Filed: Sep. 22, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 22, 2017
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION AND UBER'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS Docket No. 840, 846, 847, 848. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs have withdrawn their Emergency Motion for Authorization to Communicate with Class Members. See Docket Nos. 840, 846. It is therefore moot. In its opposition to the motion, Uber separately requests that the Court "amend its sanctions order to grant monetary sanctions in an amount sufficient to compensate Uber for the fees
Summary: ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION AND UBER'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS Docket No. 840, 846, 847, 848. EDWARD M. CHEN , District Judge . Plaintiffs have withdrawn their Emergency Motion for Authorization to Communicate with Class Members. See Docket Nos. 840, 846. It is therefore moot. In its opposition to the motion, Uber separately requests that the Court "amend its sanctions order to grant monetary sanctions in an amount sufficient to compensate Uber for the fees ..
More
ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS' EMERGENCY MOTION AND UBER'S REQUEST FOR ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS
Docket No. 840, 846, 847, 848.
EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs have withdrawn their Emergency Motion for Authorization to Communicate with Class Members. See Docket Nos. 840, 846. It is therefore moot. In its opposition to the motion, Uber separately requests that the Court "amend its sanctions order to grant monetary sanctions in an amount sufficient to compensate Uber for the fees it has incurred defending against these numerous filings." Docket No. 847 at 3. Uber's request for sanctions appears to be based on conduct following the Court's sanction's order, namely, Plaintiffs' emergency motions for relief from that order. See Docket Nos. 830, 836, 840. Subsequent conduct is not a basis for the Court to amend its earlier sanctions order. To the extent Uber seeks sanctions for that later conduct, it must file a separate, properly-noticed motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
