Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

STETLER v. McKESSON CORPORATION, 4:17-cv-00895-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170407912 Visitors: 9
Filed: Apr. 06, 2017
Latest Update: Apr. 06, 2017
Summary: ORDER TO WITHDRAW NOTICE AND OPPOSITION [DKTS 47 AND 48] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . Before the Court is the stipulation of Plaintiffs Lisa Stetler, Arturo Diaz, Josie Diaz, and Sandra Dehn ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc. ("Defendants") to withdraw two docket entries, Docket 47 and 48, from the Court's record. Having reviewed the parties' stipulation and finding good cause for the stipulated relief, the Court enters this order on th
More

ORDER TO WITHDRAW NOTICE AND OPPOSITION [DKTS 47 AND 48]

Before the Court is the stipulation of Plaintiffs Lisa Stetler, Arturo Diaz, Josie Diaz, and Sandra Dehn ("Plaintiffs") and Defendants Bristol-Myers Squibb Company and Pfizer Inc. ("Defendants") to withdraw two docket entries, Docket 47 and 48, from the Court's record.

Having reviewed the parties' stipulation and finding good cause for the stipulated relief, the Court enters this order on the stipulation. The Court has not and will not consider Docket Nos. 47 and 48, and both shall be deemed withdrawn. The clerk of the court is directed to withdraw or lock the entries, as appropriate. Instead, the parties have attached the order of Judge Morrison C. England in Stark et al., v. McKesson Corp., et al., 2:17-cv-00095-MCE-CKD to the stipulation.

[Alternatively: The Court has already considered, or intends to consider, Docket Entries 47 and/or 48, and on that basis, declines to withdraw them from the record.]

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer