Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

MARCUS v. CITY OF RICHMOND, 16-cv-02871-MMC (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170919765 Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 18, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 18, 2017
Summary: ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT MAXINE M. CHESNEY , District Judge . Before the Court are the following two motions, each filed pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (1) plaintiff George Marcus' ("Marcus") motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered September 26, 2016 in Case No. 16-2871; and (2) plaintiff Jonathan Wycinsky's ("Wycinsky") motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered October 3, 2016 in C
More

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR RELIEF FROM JUDGMENT

Before the Court are the following two motions, each filed pursuant to Rule 60(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: (1) plaintiff George Marcus' ("Marcus") motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered September 26, 2016 in Case No. 16-2871; and (2) plaintiff Jonathan Wycinsky's ("Wycinsky") motion, filed August 1, 2017, for relief from judgment entered October 3, 2016 in Case No. 16-2873. On August 15, 2017, defendant City of Richmond ("the City") filed, in each case, an opposition to both motions. Plaintiff did not file a reply. The matter came on regularly for hearing on September 15, 2017. Peter Bonis appeared on behalf of plaintiffs Marcus and Wycinsky. Christine Maloney of Foster Employment Law appeared on behalf of the City.

Having considered the parties' respective written submissions and the arguments made by counsel at the hearing, the Court, for the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, hereby DENIES the motions.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer