Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NASER v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, 5:10-CV-04475-EJD. (2012)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20121121c53 Visitors: 3
Filed: Nov. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 20, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge. Plaintiff LOAY S. NASER ("Naser") and Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE ENTERPRISE GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., AND METLIFE SECURITIES (collectively "MetLife"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows: WHEREAS by Pretrial Order dated July 3, 2012, the above-noted Court ordered that all summary judgment motions must be filed by N
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S TIME TO FILE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

Plaintiff LOAY S. NASER ("Naser") and Defendants METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, METLIFE ENTERPRISE GENERAL INSURANCE AGENCY, INC., AND METLIFE SECURITIES (collectively "MetLife"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby stipulate as follows:

WHEREAS by Pretrial Order dated July 3, 2012, the above-noted Court ordered that all summary judgment motions must be filed by November 23, 2012;

WHEREAS documents needed by Naser for his summary judgment motion were not produced to him until the middle of his deposition on November 16, 2012, at which time he received a disk containing more than 700 pages of documents;

WHEREAS the transcript of Naser's November 16, 2012 deposition, also needed by him for his summary judgment motion, was not available until today; and

WHEREAS the hearing on Naser's summary judgment motion, which was scheduled with Courtroom Clerk Elizabeth Garcia on November 13, 2012 for the first available date, will not be heard until February 15, 2013;

NOW, THEREFORE, it is hereby stipulated and agreed to, by and between all parties to the above-captioned action (i.e., Naser and MetLife), that subject to this Court's approval Naser may have a five (5) day extension — until and including November 28, 2012 — to file his motion for summary judgment.

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff Naser's time to file a summary judgment motion is extended until and including November 28, 2012. The anticipated hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment is continued from February 15, 2013 to March 1, 2013

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer