Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Chen-Oster v. Goldman, Sachs & Co., 10-cv-6950 (AT) (RWL). (2020)

Court: District Court, S.D. New York Number: infdco20200228b98 Visitors: 16
Filed: Feb. 24, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 24, 2020
Summary: ORDER ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER , Magistrate Judge . This order addresses the parties' dispute regarding the adequacy of Goldman's responses to Plaintiffs' RFAs, RFPs and Interrogatories about alternative processes considered by Goldman. (Dkt. 972, 974.) Goldman shall answer Plaintiffs' requests for admission provided Plaintiffs reframe them as "DEFENDANTS at no time from July 7, 2002 through the present CONSIDERED any alternative to [the respective process] for which it also CONSIDERED the imp
More

ORDER

This order addresses the parties' dispute regarding the adequacy of Goldman's responses to Plaintiffs' RFAs, RFPs and Interrogatories about alternative processes considered by Goldman. (Dkt. 972, 974.)

Goldman shall answer Plaintiffs' requests for admission provided Plaintiffs reframe them as "DEFENDANTS at no time from July 7, 2002 through the present CONSIDERED any alternative to [the respective process] for which it also CONSIDERED the impact on or treatment of men and women." The RFAs may be accompanied by interrogatories asking Goldman, in the event it denies the respective RFA, to identify any such alternatives considered. Goldman shall provide its responses within 14 days of service of the requests. Whether and to what extent additional documents shall be produced will be addressed depending on Goldman's responses to the RFAs and corresponding interrogatories.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer