Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

SINGH v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 1:16-cv-00446-SAB. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20161116973 Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Nov. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (ECF No. 12) STANLEY A. BOONE , Magistrate Judge . On November 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a stipulation requesting an extension of time to file his opening brief. (ECF No. 12.) Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff will file his opening brief on or before November 25, 2016. This request is granted, and the scheduling order is modified as follows: 1. Plaintiff's opening brief shall be filed on or before November 25, 2016;
More

ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF TIME AND MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER

(ECF No. 12)

On November 10, 2016, Plaintiff filed a stipulation requesting an extension of time to file his opening brief. (ECF No. 12.) Pursuant to the stipulation, Plaintiff will file his opening brief on or before November 25, 2016. This request is granted, and the scheduling order is modified as follows:

1. Plaintiff's opening brief shall be filed on or before November 25, 2016; 2. Defendant's responsive brief shall be filed on or before January 6, 2017; 3. Plaintiff may file a reply brief on or before January 26, 2017; and 4. The parties are advised that due to the impact of social security cases on the Court's docket and the Court's desire to have cases decided in an expedient manner, requests for modification of the briefing schedule will not routinely be granted and will only be granted upon a showing of good cause. Further, requests to modify the briefing schedule that are made on the eve of a deadline will be looked upon with disfavor and may be denied absent good cause for the delay in seeking an extension.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer