Filed: Dec. 12, 2013
Latest Update: Dec. 12, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER 1 ORDER JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Whereas, Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 23, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby (collectively, the "Parties") are calendared to appear for a Case Management Conference on December 13, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.; Whereas, Laurence F. Padway (counsel for Plaintiff) has been advised by his cardiologist not to work for the remainder of
Summary: STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED ] ORDER 1 ORDER JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Whereas, Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 23, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby (collectively, the "Parties") are calendared to appear for a Case Management Conference on December 13, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.; Whereas, Laurence F. Padway (counsel for Plaintiff) has been advised by his cardiologist not to work for the remainder of ..
More
STIPULATION TO CONTINUE CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND [PROPOSED] ORDER 1 ORDER
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
Whereas, Pursuant to the Court's Order of September 23, 2013, the parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, hereby (collectively, the "Parties") are calendared to appear for a Case Management Conference on December 13, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.;
Whereas, Laurence F. Padway (counsel for Plaintiff) has been advised by his cardiologist not to work for the remainder of the month for medical reasons;
Now, therefore, the parties stipulate to continue the case management conference to January 10, 2013 at 1:30 p.m.
[PROPOSED] ORDER
Pursuant to stipulation, IT IS SO ORDERED. The case management conference in the above matter is continued to January 10, 2014 at 1:30 p.m. 2014 The parties shall file an updated joint case management statement by January 3, 2014 in which the parties propose a briefing schedule for cross-motions for summary judgment whereby one party files an opening motion, the other party files an opposition and cross-motion in the same brief, the first party files a reply and an opposition to the cross-motion in one brief, and then the second party files a reply brief in support of the cross-motion.
