Filed: Sep. 07, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 11-15248 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15248 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00180-RAL-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JON JERALD HAMMILL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 7, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: John Badalamenti, appointed coun
Summary: Case: 11-15248 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 11-15248 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00180-RAL-EAJ-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus JON JERALD HAMMILL, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida _ (September 7, 2012) Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: John Badalamenti, appointed couns..
More
Case: 11-15248 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
________________________
No. 11-15248
Non-Argument Calendar
________________________
D.C. Docket No. 8:11-cr-00180-RAL-EAJ-1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff-Appellee,
versus
JON JERALD HAMMILL,
Defendant-Appellant.
________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court
for the Middle District of Florida
________________________
(September 7, 2012)
Before BARKETT, PRYOR and HILL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
John Badalamenti, appointed counsel for Jon Hammill in this direct criminal
appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the appellant and
Case: 11-15248 Date Filed: 09/07/2012 Page: 2 of 2
filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California,
386 U.S. 738,
87 S. Ct. 1396,
18
L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals that
counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because
independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,
counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Hammill’s conviction and
sentence are AFFIRMED.
2