Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

United States v. Thomas John Bach, II, 12-10543 (2012)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 12-10543 Visitors: 27
Filed: Sep. 11, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 26, 2017
Summary: Case: 12-10543 Date Filed: 09/11/2012 Page: 1 of 2 [DO NOT PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT _ No. 12-10543 Non-Argument Calendar _ D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00032-MCR-1 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee, versus THOMAS JOHN BACH, II, Defendant-Appellant. _ Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Florida _ (September 11, 2012) Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges PER CURIAM: Chet Kaufman, appointed coun
More
              Case: 12-10543    Date Filed: 09/11/2012   Page: 1 of 2

                                                              [DO NOT PUBLISH]

               IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

                        FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT
                         ________________________

                                No. 12-10543
                            Non-Argument Calendar
                          ________________________

                     D.C. Docket No. 3:11-cr-00032-MCR-1

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

                                                          Plaintiff-Appellee,

                                       versus

THOMAS JOHN BACH, II,

                                                          Defendant-Appellant.

                         __________________________

               Appeal from the United States District Court for the
                          Northern District of Florida
                         _________________________

                                (September 11, 2012)

Before CARNES, WILSON and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges

PER CURIAM:

      Chet Kaufman, appointed counsel for Thomas John Bach, II, in this direct

criminal appeal, has moved to withdraw from further representation of the

appellant and filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 
386 U.S. 738
, 87 S.Ct.
              Case: 12-10543    Date Filed: 09/11/2012   Page: 2 of 2

1396, 
18 L. Ed. 2d 493
 (1967). Our independent review of the entire record reveals

that counsel’s assessment of the relative merit of the appeal is correct. Because

independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit,

counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and Bach’s conviction and sentence

are AFFIRMED.




                                         2

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer