Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Huweih v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc., 2:17-cv-01370-JAM-DB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170913e97 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 08, 2017
Latest Update: Sep. 08, 2017
Summary: JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS JOHN A. MENDEZ , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES: Plaintiff AMAL HUWEIH ("Plaintiff") and defendants CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. ("Caliber"), and SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC ("Summit"), collectively ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate as follows: 1. Instead of opposing Defendants' motion to dismiss, Plaintiff mistakenly filed a First Amen
More

JOINT STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS' MOTION TO DISMISS

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND TO ALL INTERESTED PARTIES:

Plaintiff AMAL HUWEIH ("Plaintiff") and defendants CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC. ("Caliber"), and SUMMIT MANAGEMENT COMPANY, LLC ("Summit"), collectively ("Defendants"), by and through their attorneys of record, hereby jointly stipulate as follows:

1. Instead of opposing Defendants' motion to dismiss, Plaintiff mistakenly filed a First Amended Complaint ("FAC") in response thereto. Plaintiff thus both failed to timely oppose the motion to dismiss and filed her FAC outside the permitted window of Fed. R. Civ. P 15.

2. To prevent wasting the parties' and Court's time and resources with law and motion relating to said oversight, the Parties wish to enter into this stipulation.

3. Defendants' motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(3) is unopposed (and previously stipulated to) and, therefore, should be deemed GRANTED. The parties respectfully request the Court transfer this action, in the interest of justice, to the Northern District of California for the following reasons: (a) Plaintiff resides in the Northern District; (b) The real property that is the subject to this action and faces potential foreclosure is located in the Northern District; (c) Defendants are not California citizens; and (d) To prevent further burden on this Court and unnecessary delay in ruling on further law and motion.

4. Defendants' motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) is to be GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion, but she believes any defects can be remedied, thus, Plaintiff should be allowed to file an amended complaint if any, within seven (7) days of the date on which the case is electronically docketed by the Northern District Court. If Plaintiff does not so file, Plaintiff's complaint SHALL be dismissed with prejudice.

5. The untimely FAC, Docket No. 7, is hereby stricken pursuant to this Court's minute order, Docket No. 8, and this Stipulation for Order.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

The stipulation is approved.

(1) Defendants' motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(3) is GRANTED. Venue is proper in, and the case SHALL be transferred to, the United States District Court in and for the Northern District of California;

(2) Defendants' motion to dismiss under FRCP 12(b)(6) is presently unopposed and hereby GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff did not oppose the motion, but she shall be allowed to file an amended complaint, if any, within seven (7) days of the date on which this case is electronically docketed in the Northern District. If Plaintiff does not so file, Plaintiff's complaint SHALL be dismissed with prejudice.

(3) Docket No. 7, is hereby stricken.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer