Lor v. Berryhill, 1:18-cv-0164-JLT. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180619694
Visitors: 32
Filed: Jun. 18, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 18, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 15, 2018, the parties stipulated that Defendant have an extension of thirty days to file the certified administrative record in this action. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Do
Summary: ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME (Doc. 9) JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On June 15, 2018, the parties stipulated that Defendant have an extension of thirty days to file the certified administrative record in this action. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS: 1. The request for an extension of time (Doc..
More
ORDER GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME
(Doc. 9)
JENNIFER L. THURSTON, Magistrate Judge.
On June 15, 2018, the parties stipulated that Defendant have an extension of thirty days to file the certified administrative record in this action. (Doc. 9) Notably, the Scheduling Order permits a single thirty-day extension by the stipulation of parties (Doc. 5 at 4), and this is the first extension requested by either party. Accordingly, the Court ORDERS:
1. The request for an extension of time (Doc. 9) is GRANTED; and
2. Defendant SHALL file the administrative record on or before July 23, 2018.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
